An individual undertakes his first property purchase-and-sale transaction in Singapore. His stated purpose from the outset is to buy the property solely for resale at a profit, and he carries out that plan. He claims that income tax cannot apply because he has never sold another property. Which statement best reflects IRAS's approach?
IRAS states that gains may be taxable where property is bought and sold with a profit-seeking motive or the person is deemed to be trading in properties. Frequency is one assessment criterion, not an express first-sale exemption or a requirement for a second completed sale. The stated resale purpose therefore needs consideration in assessing the gain. This does not mean that every first sale is taxable; the correct conclusion is that his claimed automatic exclusion is unsound.